Dems bury, On the first night of the Democratic National Convention, President Joe Biden’s speech took place in a time slot that might as well have been labeled “lost in time.” Scheduled for 11:28 p.m., Biden’s address was strategically pushed to a late hour traditionally reserved for reruns of old sitcoms, hinting at a broader strategy to limit viewership and perhaps minimize his impact. This was no random scheduling choice; it was a deliberate move to sideline Biden’s message amid a crowded roster of speakers who, collectively, set the tone for a night focused more on showcasing party unity than celebrating Biden’s presidency.
The convention’s lineup on that opening night spoke volumes about the state of the Democratic Party and its current strategies. The lineup included figures like New York Governor Kathy Hochul and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who are known for their respective roles in party leadership and progressive advocacy. In a sense, this roster felt less like a celebration of the incumbent president and more like an elaborate warm-up act, setting the stage for Biden’s somewhat diminished role in the evening’s proceedings.
Biden’s speech was positioned as a showcase of his accomplishments, though the presentation often blurred the line between reality and idealism. He spoke of his administration’s achievements, touching upon themes like combating hate and addressing the aftermath of the January 6th insurrection. Yet, his rhetoric seemed increasingly detached from the contemporary political landscape, where criticisms of his administration’s handling of various issues—such as its response to the COVID-19 pandemic—are mounting.
A particularly contentious moment came when Biden spoke about Charlottesville and the rise of hate under Trump’s presidency. He criticized Trump for allegedly emboldening anti-Semites, yet this criticism appeared incongruent with the current environment where incidents of hate and extremism persist, even on college campuses, often in the form of pro-Hamas protests. Biden’s attempt to empathize with these protests seemed more like an awkward concession than a meaningful address of the issues at hand.